Which is Better: Trump Wealth or Clinton Wealth?

Hillary criticizes Trump for getting rich while providing jobs for poor people in developing countries; Trump criticizes Hillary for becoming wealthy by providing aid to poor people in developing countries while taking a cut of course and taking $250,000 an hour speaking fees from Goldman Sachs and other Wall St firms all the while railing against Wall St greed. According to Hillary that's the going rate so it's okay. Which argument speaks to you says a lot about your sense of right and wrong.

Hillary Fighting for the Middle Class: One $225,000 Goldman Sachs Speech at a Time

When asked about her speaking fees where Goldman Sachs paid her $675,000 for 3 speeches, Hillary said, "Well that's what they offered."

So is she really the champion of the middle class?

Is she really the candidate who will stand up to Wall St and hedge fund managers? Aren't the fees earned by hedge fund managers "What they [clients] offered [agreed to pay]?" I suppose she could ask her son-in-law the Wall St hedge fund manager.

Are 3 speeches all Goldman expects from a future President Hillary Clinton?

Would anyone accept an answer like this from a Republican candidate?