What Is the Difference Between Bill Cosby and Bill Clinton?

Both Bill Cosby and Bill Clinton have been accused by many women of sexual assault. At last count, I think they are about dead even. So why are the media only interested in Cosby? As a matter of fact, when the media weren't completely ignoring the accusations against Clinton, they were giving airtime to his cronies like James Carville so they could disparage the character of his accusers and call them "trailer trash" and the like. Or allowing Hillary during an interview with Matt Lauer to dismiss the accusations without challenge as the work of a vast right wing conspiracy. So why the difference in treatment?

At one time, Cosby was the darling of the Left. He said the right things. He acted the right way. He stuck to the business of acting and comedy. However, somewhere along the way things changed. Maybe it was the murder of his only son, Ennis. Or maybe it was his advancing years. Regardless, the Cos started stepping off the liberal plantation. He began to criticize the behavior of the young blacks of today. He began to speak out against the use of the Ebonics (Black English), the black drop out rate, single parenthood and consumption of frivolous things at the expense of necessities. Cosby began advocating self-reliance and responsibility. How dare he suggest that not all the problems in the black community are the result of white racism! Cosby had crossed the line and now he has to be discredited; personally and professionally destroyed while, if Democrats have their way, Bill Clinton may well be on his way back to the White House ironically as "The First Gentleman". Equal justice liberal-style.

Apparently, all sins, including violence against women, are forgivable as long as you are a good, liberal, Democrat.