What started the sequence of events that had the
Administration careening toward what appeared to be yet another blunder was
President Obama's statement back in 2012 that if Syrian President Assad used
chemical weapons that would be crossing a "red line." The off-handed
and off-teleprompter remark placed the United States in the position of having
to either take action against Syria or losing credibility when on August 21st
of this year, someone (allegedly the Assad regime) fired rockets armed with
chemical warheads into eleven neighborhoods in the Damascus suburbs killing
1500 civilians - 400 of which were children. Over the next several days,
President Obama and Secretary of State Kerry tried to make the case for attacking
Syria to let Assad know there are consequences to violating international law
regarding the use of gas. Initially, Mr. Obama claimed he didn’t need the
approval of Congress in order to strike Syria but as his efforts to build the
support of the international community failed, he pivoted and said he would ask
for Congressional approval. As the Administration tried to convince lawmakers
and the American public that attacking Syria was in our national interest, the
president began to receive criticism for “drawing the red line.” True to form,
Mr. Obama denied drawing the red line and tried to blame everyone else - the
world and Congress - despite the video of him clearly using the words “red
line.” It was soon very apparent that this effort was also doomed to failure.
While answering the question, ‘Is there anything that Syria can do to avoid
being attacked?’ during a CNN interview, Sec. Kerry made his own off-handed
remark. Kerry flippantly replied, ‘Well of course they could give up all their
chemical weapons within the week but that’s not going to happen.’ Kerry made
this remark never dreaming anyone would take it seriously. However, when Russia
and Syria indicated that they might be willing to discuss this proposal, he
soon began backtracking and even the liberal press recognized this to be a
major screw-up. With an address to the nation scheduled to take place within two days, things
were looking pretty bleak for Team Barry. Suddenly it must have occurred to
Obama and Company, that they had just been thrown a “life line.” What had initially
been universally seen as a blunder was now being hailed by Kerry, Obama, and
liberals everywhere as a great secret plan that had been weeks in the making.
You know what they say, ‘Success has many parents; failure is an orphan.’ In
his Tuesday night address, the president said he would delay asking for Congressional
approval to strike Syria and that he would allow time to see if diplomacy might
still lead to a peaceful solution. The president did however say that a
military strike was not off the table if the weapons turnover proposal failed.
President Obama was ‘off the hook.’
Since his speech, Mr. Obama and his administration have been
patting themselves on the back for getting Russia to take the lead on Syria. Barack
Obama has slipped comfortably back into his preferred leading from behind mode.
In his new role as world leader, Mr. Putin wrote an Op-Ed piece for the New
York Times that chastised President Obama for his handling of the crisis in Syria and warned him not to take
military action. Not fully recovered from having so narrowly dodged a bullet,
Obama and the gang that can’t shoot straight hasn’t had time to realized that
they should be humiliated.There is a saying, “There are three kinds of people in the world: Those that make things happen; those that watch things happen and those who say, ‘What just happened?’ I’ll leave it to you to decide for yourself which one is Obama; which one is Putin and which one is Kerry.
Ken, Great column. However, I think that the people who have been following what has been going on in Syria realize the the administration has been humiliated. Those who follow the 6 o'clock news don't know any better, as you said.
ReplyDeleteI got the following quote from Dennis Byrne, a Chicago columnist who summed up the the leadership succinctly: "If I may, it's nothing compared with the incompetence and vacillation of the Obama administration. An editorial on these pages Sunday carefully documents Obama's massive failure of leadership as compared with Bush's careful preparations. Obama came to the presidency demonstrably unprepared for the leadership, management and decision-making tasks required of the office; only now is he discovering that organizing an international coalition isn't the same as "mobilizing" laid-off factory workers on the Far South Side as a community organizer." Below is the link to this colunn: http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-09-09/opinion/ct-oped-0910-byrne-20130910_1_president-barack-obama-obama-administration-syrian-civil-war
Thanks for your comments and the link. I'll check it out as soon as I get a chance. The arrogent Obama overestimated his own ability and underestimated the credit due Bush for what he was able to accomplish.
ReplyDelete